Rheumatology and COVID-19

Current pandemic implies changes in patient care in rheumatology to reduce the risk of coronavirus transmission to patients visiting health-care facilities, by organizing less frequent blood tests, using teleconsultations, and switching from intravenous to subcutaneous drug administration. Patients under immunosuppressive treatment are considered at high risk of severe outcome and are protected accordingly by the Swiss authorities. However, current, scarce scientific evidence suggests that patients under immunosuppressive therapy do not necessarily develop severe COVID-19 presentations. Therefore, the current guidelines recommend pursuing the treatment throughout the pandemic. In case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, immunosuppressive drugs should be temporarily stopped, except for glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine.Copyright © 2020 Editions Medecine et Hygiene. All rights reserved.

Covid 19 in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

Objectives: BIOBADAGUAY is the Paraguayan/Uruguayan registry of adverse events in patients with inflammatory rheumatic conditions under biologic therapy (BT). Three years have elapsed from the first case of coronavirus and data about South American patients with COVID are still scarce. In this study we analyzed the frequency and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases from Paraguay. Method(s): A cross sectional study of Paraguayan patients with rheumatic diseases from BIOBADAGUAY and controls without BT. Clinical, epidemiological, and COVID-19 data were analyzed. Only cases confirmed by SARSCoV-2 positive PCR test were included. Descriptive analysis were performed for this study. Result(s): 832 patients were included (696 under BT and 136 controls). 116 (13.9%) had COVID-19. 22 had a second infection and 9 a third reinfection. Table 1 shows characteristic of COVID-19 patients. The most frequent diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 93, 80.2%) followed by ankylosing spondylitis (n = 6, 5.2%), undifferentiated spondylarthritis (n = 5, 4.3%), psoriatic arthritis (n = 4, 3.4%), juvenile onset arthritis (n = 2, 1.7%), vasculitis (n = 2, 1.7%). Only 1 case (0.8%) were registered for Still's disease, enteropathic spondylarthritis, systemic sclerosis and seronegative polyarthritis, respectively. When comorbidities were analyzed, 46 (39.6%) patients had at least one (Table 1). Of the total treatments received: 65 (56.0%) had methotrexate, 53 (45.7%) leflunomide, 3 (2.5%) sulfasalazine, 15 (12.9%) hydroxychloroquine, 25 (21.5%) glucocorticoid, 52 (44.8%) anti-TNF and 20 (17.2%) non-anti-TNF. COVID-19 severity outcomes were: 101(87%) non severe, 31 (26.7%) severe and 1 fatal(0.8%). 189 (90.9%) patients received vaccination and the mean number of doses were 2.5 doses. 55 (26.4%) had COVID prior to vaccination Conclusion(s): In this study we examined the frequency of COVID-19 in Paraguayan patients with rheumatic diseases. In this cohort of rheumatologic patients, COVID 19 severity was similar to the one in the general population.

Incidence and Management of Inflammatory Arthritis in England before and during the Covid- 19 Pandemic: A Population-Level Cohort Study Using Opensafely

Background/Aims The impact of the pandemic on the incidence and management of inflammatory arthritis (IA) is not understood. Routinely-captured data in secure platforms, such as OpenSAFELY, offer unique opportunities to understand how IA was impacted upon by the pandemic. Our objective was to use OpenSAFELY to assess the effects of the pandemic on diagnostic incidence and care delivery for IA in England, and replicate key metrics from the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit. Methods With the approval of NHS England, we used primary care and hospital data for 17 million adults registered with general practices using TPP health record software, to explore the following outcomes between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2022: 1) incidence of IA diagnoses (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, undifferentiated IA) recorded in primary care;2) time to first rheumatology assessment;3) time to first prescription of a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) in primary care, and choice of first csDMARD. Results From 17,683,500 adults (representing 40% of the English population), there were 31,280 incident IA diagnoses recorded between April 2019 and March 2022. New IA diagnoses decreased by 39.7% in the early months of the pandemic. Overall, a 20.3% decrease in IA diagnoses was seen in the year commencing April 2020, relative to the preceding year (5.1 vs. 6.4 diagnoses per 10,000 adults, respectively). Further decreases coincided with rising COVID-19 numbers, before returning to pre-pandemic levels by the end of the study period. No rebound increase in IA incidence was observed as of April 2022. The median time from referral to first rheumatology assessment was shorter during the pandemic (18 days;IQR 8-35 days) than before (21 days;9-41 days). The proportion of patients prescribed csDMARDs in primary care was comparable to before the pandemic;however, fewer people were prescribed methotrexate or leflunomide, and more were prescribed sulfasalazine or hydroxychloroquine. Conclusion IA diagnoses decreased markedly during the early phase of the pandemic;however, the impact on rheumatology assessment times and DMARD prescribing was less marked than might have been anticipated. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using routinelycaptured, near real-time data in the secure OpenSAFELY platform to benchmark care quality on a national scale, without the need for manual data collection.

Drug-induced pericarditis

Though not common, drug-induced pericarditis is a serious condition, since pericardial tamponade, should it develop, may be life-threatening. As the number of drugs is constantly expanding, so does the proportion of those capable of causing pericarditis. The authors reviewed the relevant literature in the PubMed database and complemented it with information from the VigiBase database. In their article, the authors present current knowledge about the mechanisms of origin and level of risk of drug-induced pericarditis and discuss relevant information on individual drugs divided into 7 classes. Some medicines are associated with a high risk of developing pericarditis, a fact to be taken into account when treating patients with these agents. © 2022 Czech Society of Cardiology Z.S. All rights reserved.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review

Background: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a life-threatening drug-induced condition presenting with skin rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, systemic involvement and hematological (eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes) findings. Although DRESS syndrome is frequently associated with reactivation of herpesviruses, the link between DRESS and COVID-19 has not been systematically analyzed. Method(s): A systematic search using PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines to identify all reported DRESS cases associated with COVID-19 published between January 2020 and January 2022 using the keywords "COVID-19" AND "DRESS syndrome" OR "drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms" OR "drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome" OR "eosinophilia" AND "SARS-CoV- 2" OR "coronavirus". The identified DRESS cases were evaluated using the Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) scoring system [Kardaun et al, 2007]. Result(s): We identified twelve published DRESS cases associated with COVID-19 (Table 1). Eleven patients presented with severe COVID-19 disease complicated by DRESS syndrome that developed several days after initial COVID-19 clinical presentation (ARDS n5;multiorgan failure n1;pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation, n4), one patient was asymptomatic. The culprit drugs included piperacillin-tazobactam (n4), hydroxychloroquine (n5), vancomycin (n2), ceftriaxone (n1), midazolam (n1), sulphasalazine (n1), azithromycin (n1), esomeprazole (n1), cefepime (n1), levofloxacin (n1), and meropenem (n1). The latency between the onset of treatment with culprit drug(s) and the onset of symptoms ranged from 9 to 42 days. All patients presented with widespread maculopapular rash, affecting > 50% of body surface area;five patients also had facial edema. Systemic involvement included liver (n8), renal abnormalities (n8), and heart involvement (n4). All patients had elevated body temperature (fever > = 38.5degreeC, n6) and blood eosinophilia, five patients had lymphadenopathy. Atypical lymphocytes were a rare laboratory finding (n2). Systemic corticosteroids were used in all patients;three patients received benralizumab for DRESS syndrome. Nine patients recovered, two patients died and the outcome was not reported in one case Conclusion(s): DRESS syndrome in COVID-19 patients is associated with multiple drugs, most notably with hydroxychloroquine and a variety of antibiotics. An early recognition may improve management of DRESS syndrome in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 in a patient with Good's syndrome and in 13 patients with common variable immunodeficiency

Antibody deficiencies constitute the majority of primary immunodeficiencies in adults. These patients have a well-established increased risk of bacterial infections but there is a lack of knowledge regarding the relative risks upon contracting COVID-19. In this monocentric study the disease course of COVID-19 in 1 patient with Good's syndrome and in 13 patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is described. The severity of disease ranged from very mild to severe. Several patients required hospitalization and immunomodulatory treatment but all survived. Although viral infections are not a typical feature of humoral immunodeficiencies we recommend that vigilance is increased in the management of patients with Good's syndrome and CVID during the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2021

Methodology, efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in treating inflammatory bowel disease

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), as an emerging therapy, can be used to treat microbiota related diseases. Progresses in donor screening, washed microbiota preparation, microbiota delivery routes, clinical administrative strategies, and long-term safety are moving FMT forward. Increasing clinical studies, especially those randomized controlled trials about ulcerative colitis and pilot real-word studies about serious inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have been conducted. This review presents the latest findings about the efficacy, safety and methodology of FMT in treating IBD.Copyright © 2020 The Authors

Nail ridging in rheumatoid arthritis patients and relation to disease activity: An integrated rheumatology-dermatology multi-centre study

Aim of the work: To evaluate the frequency of nail ridging (NR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to study its relation to disease activity. Patients and methods: 230 RA patients and 97 matched controls from Helwan, Ain Shams and Mansoura university hospitals were studied. Disease activity score (DAS28) was assessed. NR has been searched for in all patients. The number of affected fingers was recorded. NR was determined by a magnifying lens, seen by naked eye or seen and felt. Dermoscopic photography of the NR using Dermalite DL4 3Gen dermatoscope has been recorded. Results: The median age of patients was 49 years (42–58 years);they were 221 females and 19 males (F:M 11.1:1) with a disease duration 9 years (5–11 years). Their DAS28 was 3.6 (2.9–4.6). NR was significantly increased in RA cases vs. control;73% vs 20%;p < 0.001. In patients, NR was detected by a magnifying lens in 32.6%, seen in 27% and seen and felt in 13.5%. Joint deformities were significantly higher in those with NR. DAS28 was a significant independent predictor of NR;for every one-point increase in DAS28, there was a 153 times higher odds to exhibit NR at a sensitivity of 93.5%, specificity 80.3% and at a diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Conclusion: NR is a frequent finding in RA. An integrated rheumatological- dermatological clinical evaluation may be helpful and further studies are required to prove the importance of this sign for follow up of RA patients.

Cancer, Covid and Control of Ra - a Toxic Combination?

Case report - Introduction: This case highlights the dilemma of keeping rheumatoid arthritis disease under control in active cancer cases and establishing a consistent multidisciplinary dialogue during a pandemic and staffing crises. During chemotherapy and active cancer treatment, disease-modifying therapies (conventional and biologic) are often stopped. In some cases, the potential benefits versus risks of restarting usual therapies have to be balanced against risks of suppressing disease activity with highdose steroids. Risks of infection (common and atypical) need to be considered. Case report - Case description: A is a 67-year-old female nonsmoker diagnosed with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RF, anti - CCP positive) in 2008. Other conditions include type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation (on warfarin), hypothyroidism and obstructive sleep apnoea. Due to active disease, despite triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine), anti-TNF therapy (etanercept) commenced in 2009 with primary non-response. However, she responded well to B-cell therapy (rituximab) in conjunction with oral methotrexate (25mg weekly) receiving annual infusions from 2010 to 2016. In 2017, an elective sleeve gastrectomy procedure for high BMI was abandoned after peritoneal deposits of concern were noted. Histology and CT imaging were consistent with a primary peritoneal malignancy (Stage 3c low-grade serous adenocarcinoma). Treatment involved debulking surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpinoophorectomy, omentectomy) and tamoxifen. Treatment for rheumatoid arthritis stalled during this period but as frequent steroids were required for active joint inflammation, in agreement with the oncologists, she had a rituximab cycle in 2018. Unfortunately, in 2019 she had signs of cancer progression (elevated tumour markers, CT imaging) and has subsequently started carboplatin chemotherapy. She has been unable to continue methotrexate or rituximab pending completion of the chemotherapy cycles (ongoing). However, her arthritis is now uncontrolled without increased steroids. Due to recurrent flares, her maintenance dose has been increased from 5mg to 7.5-10mg prednisolone daily until we can establish if it is safe and appropriate to recommence her usual arthritis regime. Even without disease-modifying therapy like methotrexate and rituximab, risk of infection (including atypical ones) is still significant with the combination of chemotherapy and steroids. Risk of progressive joint damage and adverse quality of life with active arthritis also needs to be considered. Staffing crises, exacerbated by COVID pandemic issues, have added to complexity of decision making and coordination of regular multidisciplinary discussions regarding treatment. Case report - Discussion: Cancer is a known association in rheumatoid arthritis patients with a twofold higher risk of lymphoma compared to the general population. Whether condition or treatment affects risk remains unclear as immune dysregulation is relevant in both autoimmunity and cancer. Paraneoplastic, recent onset arthritis, chemotherapy- or immunotherapy-induced arthralgia/arthritis are also well documented. This case had a seropositive rheumatoid arthritis phenotype quite a few years prior to cancer diagnosis. Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon, often presenting as in this case as an incidental finding. It is usually treated like ovarian cancer Whilst methotrexate has been implicated in lung cancer, melanoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, overall safety data suggest any risk is quite low (e.g., EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders usually resolve with drug discontinuation). It is also a known chemotherapeutic agent. Anti-TNF treatment algorithms generally exclude patients with recent cancer. Rituximab, originally developed as a cancer drug, is not thought to affect risk of cancer development or progression. Treatment with disease-modifying therapy (conventional and biologics) is often withheld in patients with active malignancy undergoing chemotherapy due to a theo etical risk of potentiated immunosuppression and toxicity, particularly cytopaenias. However, maintaining arthritis control with glucocorticoids also has short- and long-term risks. Combining chemotherapy agents like carboplatin with methotrexate has been used for urothelial carcinoma and can be well tolerated with close monitoring of haematological parameters. Thus, it could be argued this patient is at risk of infections whichever treatment approach is taken and regaining control of arthritis with recommencement of methotrexate and rituximab is much better for her quality of life. Regular multidisciplinary discussions are important to outline risks versus benefits of combined treatment. This may be difficult in practice during staffing crises. Covid risk in patients receiving rituximab and/or chemotherapy, timing and response to COVID vaccination are also important considerations. Case report - Key learning points: . Primary peritoneal cancer is uncommon and can present as an incidental finding . Whilst treatment for progressive cancer is important, withholding rheumatoid arthritis treatment can have a significant adverse impact on quality of life . Morbidity and mortality risks of stopping treatment versus combined treatment (cancer therapy and disease-modifying therapy) ideally needs to be fully discussed and agreed with the patient and all care providers - lack of "named" providers, restructuring, redeployment, multi-specialty care and a global pandemic can make coordination of this difficult.

Delayed leukopenia following intentional azathioprine ingestion

Background: Azathioprine is a purine analog metabolized to 6- mercaptopurine (6-MP) utilizing glutathione. Its high oral bioavailability and longer duration of action make it viable as a treatment for ulcerative colitis or as an anti-rejection medication for renal transplant patients. Specific experience in overdose with this agent is limited although toxicity mimics 6-MP including hepatotoxicity, delayed leukopenia, and acute interstitial nephritis. Case report: A 46 year old female (64 kg) with a history of ulcerative colitis, migraines, and anxiety presented with a selfreported intentional ingestion of 1000mg azathioprine and presented to care approximately 8 h post-ingestion. Her compliance with azathioprine preceding the ingestion was unclear. She reported taking her other medications as prescribed (tadalafil, sulfasalazine, fioricet, alprazolam) the day prior to presentation. Other than one episode of emesis without pill fragments, myalgias, headache she had no other symptoms. Her presenting vital signs were HR 84, RR 22, BP 90/63, T 36.2 degreeC. Initial labs included a normal chemistry profile, undetectable serum acetaminophen and salicylates, an ethanol level of 50 mg/dL and venous lactate of 1.6mmol/L. She received a total of 3 L of crystalloid IV fluids with improvement in blood pressure to 125/66 and was transferred for higher level of care. Due to the delay in presentation and well appearance, activated charcoal and hemodialysis were considered but deferred. While inpatient she had laboratory evaluation including CBC and differential every 8 h. In the ED she developed a fever, 38.1 degreeC. PCR testing for COVID-19 was negative. Whole blood thiopurine metabolites (Prometheus Biosciences, Test 3200) were sent approximately 33 h from time of ingestion. 6-thioguanine levels were 108 pmol/8x10degree8 RBC, below the therapeutic reference range (230-400 pmol/8x10degree8 RBC). 6-methylmercaptopurine metabolites were below the lower limit of quantification (761pmol/8x10degree8 RBC). Genetic testing for thiopurine S-methyltransferase was declined by the patient. She was hospitalized for 4 days and did not develop any substantial vital sign abnormalities or creatinine elevation. Her absolute neutrophil count dropped to 500/mm3 approximately 76 h post-ingestion, but started to improve 84 h post-ingestion and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor was deferred. Her peak AST was 113 IU/L, approximately 46 h post-ingestion and returned to normal (16 IU/L) upon follow-up 7 days postingestion. White blood cell count 7 days post-ingestion was 4.3 K/mm3. Discussion(s): Azathioprine overdose is rarely reported in the literature. Case reports describe delayed leukopenia and hepatotoxicity from repeat supratherapeutic ingestions, however, based upon limited experience serious toxicity from single acute ingestions appears rare. A report of a single acute ingestion of 7500mg of azathioprine resulted in moderate leukopenia (4.1 K/ mm3) 3 days post-ingestion. Peak immunosuppressive effects can take up to 2 weeks from initiation or change in dose. Symptoms in this case are consistent with effects from azathioprine including vomiting, transient hypotension, and myalgias. Conclusion(s): Intentional ingestions of azathioprine are infrequently reported and can result in serious delayed myelosuppression. We report a case of a single acute ingestion of >15 mg/kg resulting in delayed myelosuppression managed conservatively.

A CASE OF PNEUMOCYSTIS JIROVECI PNEUMONIA MIMICKING METHOTREXATE-INDUCED PNEUMONITIS

SESSION TITLE: Procedures in Chest Infections Case Posters SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 01:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is known to cause potentially life-threatening pneumonia in patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Here we describe a case of an elderly man on low dose methotrexate with PJP pneumonia initially mistaken for drug induced pneumonitis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79 year old man with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia on methotrexate, indeterminate colitis on azathioprine and sulfasalazine and interstitial lung disease was admitted for 3 week history of worsening dyspnea, lethargy and cough. On arrival his oxygen saturation was 87% on room air, requiring 5 liters oxygen via nasal canula. Lung examination was notable for bilateral crackles. Laboratory studies showed white blood cell count 12.4k/μL, lactate 2.7mmol/L, procalcitonin 0.137ng/mL, lactate dehydrogenase(LDH) 925 IU/L, 1,3 β-D glucan elevated at 154pg/mL. Infectious work up including COVID-19 testing was unremarkable. Chest radiograph showed bilateral diffuse interstitial infiltrates (figure 1) and computed tomography (CT) scan showed peripheral reticular changes and patchy ground glass opacities bilaterally (figures 2;3). He was initially treated for possible bacterial pneumonia;then with 125mg of methylprednisolone for presumed methotrexate induced pneumonitis without improvement. He underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage(BAL) gram stain showing numerous histiocytes and scattered lymphocytes;no infectious organisms were isolated. PJP PCR from BAL came back positive and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) was started. Despite maximum therapy he deteriorated clinically, transitioned to comfort care and expired. DISCUSSION: Diagnosis of PJP is made by visualization of cystic or trophic forms in respiratory tissue obtained via biopsy, BAL or sputum. Fungal burden is typically lower in non-HIV patients with PJP, and may result in negative BAL or sputum stain. Thus PCR testing is a useful diagnostic tool. Positive PCR alone cannot distinguish between colonization and active disease, and should be performed when clinical suspicion is high. 1,3 β-D glucan and LDH are nonspecific markers that help in presumptive diagnosis. First line therapy for PJP is TMP-SMX, with atovaquone, dapsone and pentamidine available as alternative therapies. Duration of therapy should be at least 21 days. Adjunctive corticosteroids show survival benefit in HIV-infected individuals. In severely hypoxic patients, corticosteroids are beneficial if started within 72 hours of antibiotic initiation. Their use in non-HIV PJP cases remains controversial. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the risk of PJP with long term methotrexate therapy. Cough, hypoxemia and bilateral interstitial infiltrates should prompt work-up for PJP. Timely recognition and early treatment are crucial to prevent mortality. Further studies are needed to assess the efficacy and provide guidelines for primary prophylaxis in this population. Reference #1: Wilson JW, Limper AH, Grys TE, Karre T, Wengenack NL, Binnicker MJ. Pneumocystis jirovecii testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction and direct examination among immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patient groups and correlation to disease specificity. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;69(2):145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.10.021. PMID: 21251557;PMCID: PMC6855182. Reference #2: Salzer HJF, Schäfer G, Hoenigl M, Günther G, Hoffmann C, Kalsdorf B, Alanio A, Lange C. Clinical, Diagnostic, and Treatment Disparities between HIV-Infected and Non-HIV-Infected Immunocompromised Patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia. Respiration. 2018;96(1):52-65. doi: 10.1159/000487713. Epub 2018 Apr 10. PMID: 29635251 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Rutendo Jokomo-Nyakabau No relevant relationships by Richard Swaney No relevant relationships by Manasa Velagapudi

A CASE OF PERSISTENT COVID-19 INFECTION IN AN IMMUNOSUPPRESSED PATIENT

SESSION TITLE: COVID-19 Case Report Posters 3 SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 01:45 pm INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic quickly spread throughout the world after it was first identified in Wuhan, China in 2019. Severe cases of hypoxic respiratory failure have since filled hospitals over the past few years. We present a case of an immunosuppressed patient with persistent respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2, with a failure to mount antibody response, treated with convalescent plasma. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 54-year-old female with a past medical history significant for rheumatoid arthritis on immunosuppression with methotrexate, prednisone, sulfasalazine, and rituximab who presented with diarrhea, cough, and shortness of breath. She was unvaccinated and tested positive for COVID-19 pneumonia, which was treated with corticosteroids and Remdesevir. CT thorax revealed diffuse infiltrates (Figure-1). She had progressive hypoxia requiring ICU stay and her course was complicated by inferior wall STEMI, requiring Intra-aortic balloon pump and intubation given worsening hypoxia. She had progressive improvement and was discharged from the hospital on 4 L of supplemental oxygen after a 30-day hospital stay. She presented two days after discharge with cough, fevers and increasing oxygen requirements up to 100% high flow nasal cannula. She was septic and was treated with steroids and antibiotics. She was febrile despite broad spectrum antibiotics. CT thorax demonstrated diffuse infiltrates worsened from the previous and steroid dosing was increased (Figure-2). No obvious source of infection was found, and further evaluation revealed positive Covid-19 RT-PCR. Despite her initial infection occurring two months prior, COVID-19 anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies were negative. She was treated with two doses of convalescent plasma and had improvement in her oxygenation, going from 80% high-flow nasal cannula to 6L of supplemental oxygen within two days of administration. DISCUSSION: It's unclear whether immunosuppressed patients with rheumatologic disease are at an increased risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the use of immunosuppressants places patients at risk of an improper immune response to infection. In immunocompetent patients, the typical time to negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR is 3 weeks after positivity (1), and most patients develop antibodies within 2-3 weeks after viral exposure (2). Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies like rituximab, commonly used for rheumatologic diseases, can hinder humoral immunity, and impair vaccine response (3). Given our patient's immunosuppressive regimen, we suspect she failed to mount an immune response to COVID-19, resulting in 56 days of infection without an adequate antibody response, successfully treated with convalescent plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with significant immunosuppression regimens may fail to produce antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2, resulting in prolonged infection. Reference #1: Rodríguez-Grande, C., Adán-Jiménez, J., Catalán, P., Alcalá, L., Estévez, A., Muñoz, P., Pérez-Lago, L., de Viedma, D. G., Adán-Jiménez, J., Alcalá, L., Aldámiz, T., Alonso, R., Álvarez, B., Álvarez-Uría, A., Arias, A., Arroyo, L. A., Berenguer, J., Bermúdez, E., Bouza, E., … de la Villa, S. (2021). Inference of active viral replication in cases with sustained positive reverse transcription-PCR results for SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02277-20 Reference #2: Boechat, J. L., Chora, I., Morais, A., & Delgado, L. (2021). The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 immunopathology – Current perspectives. In Pulmonology (Vol. 27, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.03.008 Reference #3: Eisenberg, R. A., Jawad, A. F., Boyer, J., Maurer, K., McDonald, K., Prak, E. T. L., & Sullivan, K. E. (2013). Rituximab-treated patients have a poor response to influenza vaccination. Journal of Clinical Immunology, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-012-9813-x DISCLOSURES No relevant relationships by Issa Makki No relevant relationships by John Parent No relevant relationships by Jay Patel No relevant relationships by Ruchira Sengupta

SARS-COV-2 VACCINE in SPONDYLARTHRITIS PATIENTS: OVERALL MODERATE/HIGH IMMUNOGENICITY IMPAIRED by IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS and BIOLOGICAL THERAPY

Background: We recently reported an attenuate immunogenicity in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. However, the effect of spondyloarthritis (SpA) and its treatment on COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity remains to be determined for this group of patients. We therefore aimed to evaluate humoral immune responses to inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in patients with SpA (axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis) taking DMARDs and commonly used targeted biological therapies, compared with a control group(CG). Objectives: Evaluate immunogenicity and safety of CORONAVAC (Sninovac, Beijing) in Spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients. Methods: Prospective observational cohort patients diagnosed with 194 SpA and 183 CG were vaccinated with CoronaVac in two doses with a 28-days interval. 194 patients completed the study and could be paired with CG for immunogenicity analysis. Blood samples were collected in the days 0, 28 and 69 (D69) to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion(SC) and presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) in participants with negative IgG and NAb at baseline. Results: Patients and GC were comparable regarding age (p=0.93) and sex (p=1.00). Immunogenicity at D69 showed a moderate/high SC (80.2% vs. 95.7%, p<0.0001) and Nab positivity (61.6% vs. 82.7%, p<0.0001) in SpA but lower than CG. Factors associated with lower immunogenicity were older age (56.8 vs. 51.4;p=0.03318) and higher frequencies of prednisone (25.7% vs 4.2%;p=0.0004), methotrexate (51.4% vs 40.1%, p=0.0016) and TNF inhibitor (TNFi) (62.9% vs 34.5%, p=0.0035). Likewise, prednisone (17.6% vs. 2.8%, p=0.0013) and TNFi (50% vs 33.9%;p=0.0408) were associated with diminished NAb positivity. Sulfasalazine was associated with higher SC rates (8.6% vs. 26.8%, p=0.0246) and NAb positivity (13.2% vs. 29.4%, p=0.0168). The multivariate analysis revealed that older age (p=0.037), prednisone (p=0.001), TNFi (p=0.016), and methotrex-ate(p=0.017) were independently associated with lower SC while prednisone (p=0.006) and TNFi (p=0.027) were also associated with reduced NAb response. Conclusion: Our fnding of an excellent safety and moderate/high SC rate in SpA supports the recommendation of CoronaVac vaccination. The impaired immune response in the minority of patients under immunosuppressive and biological therapy requires novel strategies to enhance antibody response in this subgroup of patients.

COVID19 VACCINATION in PATIENTS with AXIAL and PERIPHERAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS and PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: ADVERSE EVENTS and IMPACT on DISEASE ACTIVITY

Background: There is scarce evidence on the rate of adverse events and the consequences on disease activity after vaccination against covid19 Objectives: To evaluate adverse events to vaccination and disease fares after vaccination in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), peripheral spondy-loarthritis (pSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to evaluate factors associated with adverse event. Methods: Cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study. Consecutive patients with diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondy-loarthritis (nr-axSpA) according to ASAS 2009 criteria;pSpA according to ASAS 2011 criteria and PsA according to CASPAR criteria were included. Demographic data, disease clinimetry, treatments, vaccination received and post-vaccination adverse events were recorded. We evaluated, according to medical criteria, whether the patient presented a fare disease after vaccination and whether it was mild, moderate or severe. We also evaluated the factors associated with the presence of at least one mild adverse event. Statistical analysis: descriptive statistics were performed, qualitative variables were expressed as frequency and percentage (%), numerical variables as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and percentile25-75. Binary logistic regression was performed using the presence of at least one mild adverse event to vaccination as the dependent variable. Results: 210 patients were included with a mean age of 45 (SD 15) years. The diagnoses were: AS 50 (23.8%), nr-axSpA 10 (4.8), pSpA 9 (4.3%), PsA 141 (67%) and time of disease evolution in months 109 (SD 96). Regarding comorbidities, the following frequencies were reported: arterial hypertension 60 (30%), diabetes mellitus 25 (12%), heart failure 4 (2%), asthma/EPOC 15 (7%), infammatory bowel disease 2 (1%), acute anterior uveitis 20 (9.5%), psoriasis 128 (61%). Sixteen percent (n=33) of the patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination. Regarding treatments, those used were: antiTNF 88 (42%), Tofacitinib 6 (2.9%), Ustekinumab 2 (1%), Secukinumab 35 (17%), Ixekizumab 2 (1%), methotrexate 98 (47%), lefunomide 7 (3. 3), sulfasalazine 7 (3.3), apremilast 1 (0.5%), continuous NSAIDs 26 (12.4%) and NSAIDs on demand 103 (49%). Vaccines received were: Sputnik V 109 (51.9%), Oxford Vaccine, AstraZeneca 63 (30%), Janssen 1 (0.5%), BioNTech Vaccine, Pfzer 1 (0.5%), Sinopharm 33 (15.7%), Moderna 0%, Novavax 0% and others;3 (1.4%). Thirty-eight percent (n=80) of patients reported having mild post-vaccination symptoms, of which 3.75% did not resolve, 41% resolved with medication and 39% resolved ad integrum without medication. The presence of mild adverse event to the vaccine was associated with lower use of methotrexate (31% vs 56 %, p<0.001), and lower age (54 (SD 14) vs 47 (SD 12), p<0.001), and lower BMI (25 (24-30.5) vs 28 (25-31), p<0.001);while no association was found with sex, diagnosis, comorbidities, treatments, desease activity or vaccines. In the logistic regression analysis all the variables remained independently associated with a lower probability of presenting a mild adverse event: methotrexate: OR: 0.30, 95%CI 0.15-0.58, p<0.001, age: OR: 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-0.99, p: 0.03, BMI: OR: 0.92, 95%CI 0.95-0.99, p: 0.02. Sixty-one percent (n=129) of patients received the 2nd dose of vaccination, which 27% (n=35) presented mild adverse event and only 1 (0.8%) patient suffered post vaccination disease fare. Conclusion: Vaccination against COVID19 appears to be safe in this population, with only mild adverse events and low frequency of fare disease. Mild adverse events were associated with less use of methotrexate, younger age and lower BMI.

LONGITUDINAL FOLLOW-UP of HUMORAL RESPONSE AGAINST SARS-COV-2 and VIRAL PERSISTENCE in 96 DMARDS-TREATED PATIENTS with PREVIOUS COVID-19 INFECTION

Background: Although it prevents severe forms of the disease, vaccination does not completely protect against the occurrence of COVID19 disease. If, DMARDs used have been associated with variable humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, the impact of their use after SARS-CoV-2 natural infection have been poorly studied. Objectives: To characterize humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 infection and viral persistence in the nasopharyngeal sphere (NP), stools and blood of patients with rheumatic disease under DMARDs, and compared to healthy controls. Methods: Prospective monocentric longitudinal study including patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis under DMARDs and with a confrmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive NP PCR and/or positive serology and/or pathognomonic thoracic tomography (CT)) during the frst or second wave of the COVID pandemic. Patients were followed up until one year after infection and humoral response was assessed before vaccination. Serum IgG and IgA antibodies against spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins were measured at every visit. Viral persistence was assessed at the early visit in the NP and stools using conventional RT-PCR and in the blood using a high sensitive technique (droplet digital PCR). Results: Between June 2020 and July 2021, we include 96 patients (50 SpA and 46 RA) with a mean age of 53 +/-14 years and 20 healthy controls (mean age 49 ± 16 years) corresponding to relatives of patients (spouses, children) living together and infected at the same time. The immune responses were analyzed according to 6 treatment groups: methotrexate (MTX)/salazopyrine (SLZ) monotherapy (n=17/2);anti-TNF monotherapy (n=24), anti-TNF + MTX (n=23);rituximab (RTX) (n=11);anti-IL17 or-23 (n=8);others (n=11). Visits were made at 1 month (29 ±13 days;n=18), 3 months (110 ±23 days;n=67), 6 months (231 ±35 days;n=48) and 12 months (368 ± 19 days;n=19) after infection. The anti-S and anti-N IgG Ab titers were not signifcantly different in the 6 treatment groups and the control population at 3 months. A signifcant decrease in anti-S IgA Ab titers was noted in the group treated with RTX (p=0.007) and with molecules targeting the IL17/23 pathway (p=0.007). A similar but non-signifcant trend was observed in these same treatment groups for anti-N IgA Ab (p=0.07). The titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at M3, was not associated with a severe COVID disease. Detection of SARS-Cov-2 RNA in stools and serum was negative for all samples taken at 1 month or 3 months. 4 patients (2 RA treated with abatacept/RTX and 2 SpA treated with anti-TNF/secukinumab) had a positive RT-PCR NP with low to very low viral load at the 1-month visit (mean Ct 36). None of these 4 patients had had a severe form of COVID19 infection. Conclusion: DMARDs-treated patients with previous proven COVID-19 did not seem to alter IgG Ab response but RTX and anti-IL17/-IL-23 might alter IgA humoral response. This lower immune response was not associated with a more severe disease. In these patients, new infection may not be considered as a full boost for the immune system. DMARDs did not induce viral persistence in the serum, the NP or in the stool.

FACTORS ASSOCIATED with the SEVERITY of COVID-19 INFECTION in PATIENTS with SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: RESULTS of the FRENCH RMD COVID-19 COHORT

Background: To our knowledge, no published work has described precisely the severity and evolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Data on COVID-19 from cohorts of patients with immune-mediated infam-matory diseases concern small samples of SpA. Objectives: Our objective was to describe the severity and course of COVID-19 in a large cohort of patients with SpA, including axial SpA (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and to identify factors associated with severe forms. Methods: Patients: individuals with Spondyloarthritis (SpA) from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort (observational, national, multicenter cohort) with a diagnosis of COVID-19 (clinical, PCR, CT or serology) were included. Data collected: demographics, type of SpA, comorbidities, treatments, severity of COVID-19. Severity of COVID-19 was graded according to care needed: mild = outpatient care;moderate = non-intensive hospital treatment;severe = intensive care unit admission or death;severe = moderate or severe. Statistical analyses: Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with these severe forms. All variables with p <0.20 in the univariate analysis were proposed in the multivariate model. Treatment variables (non-ste-roidal anti-infammatory drugs (NSAIDs), methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SLZ), TNF inhibitors (TNFi), IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) and IL-23p19/p40 inhibitors (IL-23p19/p40i)) were included in the models, even if p≥0.20. Results: Between March 2020 and April 2021, 626 SpAs reported COVID-19 with a mild course in 508 cases (81.1%), moderate in 93 cases (14.8%), and severe in 25 cases (3.9%), including 6 deaths. The cohort analyzed included 349 women (55.8%), mean age 49.3 ± 14.1 years, mean BMI 27.1 ± 5.4 with 403 axSpA (64.4%), 187 PsA (29.9%) and 36 other SpA, duration of disease 11.3 ± 9.8 years;352 (56.2%) had at least one comorbidity, of which obesity (23.6%), hypertension (15.5%), and smoking (10.4%) were the most frequent. Among them, 104 were treated with NSAIDs (16.6%), 186 with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) including 156 MTX, and 460 (73.5%) with biological DMARDs (379 TNFi, 57 IL-17i, 15 IL-23p19/p40i, 9 others). The following variables were associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes: age, body mass index, chronic obstructive lung disease, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, interstitial lung disease, renal failure, and corticosteroids intake. The factors independently associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes were cor-ticosteroid intake (3.15 [CI95%: 1.46-6.76], p 0.004), and age (OR=1.06 [CI95%: 1.04-1.08], p <0.001] while anti-TNF (OR=0.26 [CI95%: 0.09-0.78], p=0.01]) was protective. NSAIDs intake (OR=0.97 [CI95%: 0.48-1.98]), SLZ (OR=7.9 [CI95%: 0.60-103]), or anti-IL17 (OR=0.37 [CI95%: 0.10-1.31]) was not associated with infection severity. Conclusion: The course of COVID-19 was mild for the majority of SpA patients (81.1%). Corticosteroid intake was associated with more severe COVID-19 outcomes, whereas TNFi were found to be protective.

COVID-19 ADMISSIONS and MORTALITY in PATIENTS with EARLY INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: RESULTS from A NATIONAL COHORT

Background: There has been a major concern about the impact of COVID-19 in patients with infammatory arthritis during the pandemic, with recommendations from governments for patients to shield. Objectives: Our aim was to describe the risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality amongst patients recruited to the National Early Infammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) in England. Methods: An observational cohort study design was used. The population included adults in England with new diagnoses of infammatory arthritis between May 2018 and March 2021 who enrolled in NEIAA. The outcomes were hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (primary admission reason or nosocomial acquisition) and death due to COVID-19 (COVID-19 stated on a death certifcate), identifed via linkage with secondary care records. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models, with adjustment for patient factors (age, gender, smoking status, and comorbidity) and disease factors (seropositivity, 28-joint disease activity score, patient-reported disability (HAQ), and functional impact (MSK-HQ)) recorded at baseline. Individuals were considered at risk from the date of diagnosis or February 2020 (whichever was later) and censored at a COVID-19 event, death or May 2021 (whichever was sooner). Results: 14,127 patients were included. The mean age was 57 years;62% were female;19% were current smokers, while 29% were ex-smokers. The frequency of comorbidities at baseline were: hypertension (19%), diabetes mellitus (9%), and lung disease (9%). Overall, 20% had two or more comorbidities. Rheumatoid factor or CCP antibodies were positive in 56%. At presentation, mean scores for DAS28 were 4.6 (+/-1.5), 1. 1 (+/-0.7) for HAQ, and 25 (+/-11) for MSK-HQ. Initial DMARD therapy was known for 13,682/14,127 patients: methotrexate was the most common (54%), followed by hydroxychloroquine (23%), and sulfasalazine (11%). There were 143 COVID-19 hospital admissions and 47 deaths, corresponding to incidence rates per 100 person-years for hospitalisation: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.79-1.10] and death: 0.31 [95% CI: 0.23-0.41]. Increasing age, male gender, diabetes, hypertension, lung disease and smoking status all predicted COVID-19 hospitalisation and death. Higher baseline DAS28 predicted COVID-19 hospitalisation (HR 1.24 [95% CI: 1.10-1.39]) and mortality (HR 1.33 [95% CI: 1.09-1.63]). Higher HAQ predicted both COVID-19 hospitalisation and death. Seropositivity was not a signifcant predictor of any COVID-19 event, nor was MSK-HQ. In unadjusted models, corticosteroids associated with COVID-19 death (HR 2.29 [95% CI: 1.02-5.13], and sulfasalazine monotherapy associated with COVID-19 hospitalisation (HR 1.93 [95% CI: 1.04-3.56]. In adjusted models, associations for corticoster-oids and sulfasalazine were no longer signifcant. Only age, smoking status, and comorbidities independently predicted COVID-19 events. Conclusion: The burden of COVID-19 amongst early arthritis patients was substantial during the pandemic, with concerns about the use of csDMARDs and corticosteroids.1,2 Patient characteristics and rheumatoid disease severity at diagnosis appear to be the more important predictors of COVID-19 events than initial treatment strategy. An important limitation is that we have not looked at treatment changes over time, and must acknowledge that many patients, especially those recruited in 2019, may have changed therapy prior to the pandemic.

EFFECTS of SULFASALAZINE USED in AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS on COVID-19 OUTCOMES: REAL-LIFE DATA from A SINGLE CENTER

Background: Compared to biologic-agents, little is known about effects of sul-fasalazine used for axial spondyloarthritis(AxSpA) on COVID-19 outcomes. Objectives: So, we aimed to understand the impact of sulfasalazine on COVID-19 in AxSpA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study from a single center which included 2344 AxSpA patients. We analyzed 219 of 406 confrmed COVID-19 patients from March 2020 to July 2021. The primary outcome was COVID-19 severity in terms of COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalization rate and length of hospitalization. Analyses were stratifed according to use of sulfasalazine and/or biologic-agents. Results: Most of the patients were male(59%) with a mean age of 45.0 years. Peripheral arthritis was present in 35% and uveitis in 15%. In total, sulfasalazine was used in 42% and biologic-agent in 42%. COVID-19 pneumonia detected in 16%, hospitalization required in 14% and median(IQR) duration of hospitalization was 10(8) days. Two patients died due to COVID-19. The sulfasalazine users had higher age, more frequent COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalization and longer hospitalization. After biologic-agent users were excluded, the sulfasalazine group had again longer hospitalization. When patients regrouped as sulfasalazine mon-otherapy, sulfasalazine+biologic and biologic monotherapy, in pairwise comparisons, sulfasalazine monotherapy group had a higher frequency of COVID-19 pneumonia than biologic monotherapy group(p=0.008). Conclusion: Although sulfasalazine seemed to be related with increased rates of COVID-19 pneumonia and hospitalization, this impact diminished after exclusion of biologic-agent users. Sulfasalazine monotherapy and sulfasalazine+bio-logic therapy might be associated with development of COVID-19 pneumonia, compared to biologic monotherapy. Our results imply sulfasalazine may be related with worse disease course AxSpA patients with COVID-19.